On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak <markfilipak.windows+ffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I reran the tests with these command lines: > > SET FFREPORT=file=FOO-GH.LOG:level=32 > > ffmpeg -i %1 -filter_complex > "telecine=pattern=46,split[A][B],[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))'[C],[B]split[E][F],[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)',datascope=size=1920x1080:x=45:y=340:mode=color2[G],[F]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[H],[G][H]blend[D],[C][D]interleave" > -map 0 -c:v libx264 -crf 20 -an -sn "C:\AVOut\FOO-GH.MKV" > > SET FFREPORT=file=FOO-HG.LOG:level=32 > > ffmpeg -i %1 -filter_complex > "telecine=pattern=46,split[A][B],[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))'[C],[B]split[E][F],[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)',datascope=size=1920x1080:x=45:y=340:mode=color2[G],[F]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[H],[H][G]blend[D],[C][D]interleave" > -map 0 -c:v libx264 -crf 20 -an -sn "C:\AVOut\FOO-HG.MKV" > > The datascope doesn't appear in either output, so frame 1 (zero-based) is > not traversing [E][H] > (upper command) or [E][G] (lower command). > > Therefore, I'm pretty confident that once frame 1 gets enqueued at [C], the > filter chain is not > recursed. >
datascope appears if you switch order of interleave pads, or use hstack/vstack filter instead of interleave filter. > Another interesting thing is the behavior of 'blend'. > > If blend gets a hit to its 2nd input (but not the 1st) the total frames > output = 479. > > If blend gets a hit to its 1st input (but not the 2nd) the total frames > output = 594. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
