> > On 04/21/2020 02:12 AM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: > > > One kind of documentation that I haven't seen around ffmpeg which I > think might be very helpful is a > > glossary. >
Agreed. While many won't read it before posting it is at least something that could be pointed to in replies, FAQs, docs etc. Given the amount of time spent trying to get people to use terminology consistently, it should be a net win; or at least save some typing. Lots of information is available but spread out. Some terms are defined on old, closed StackOverflow questions (with reference back to this ML), eg: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3199582/4647265 http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/What-does-the-output-of-ffmpeg-mean-tbr-tbn-tbc-etc-td941538.html It's not a problem when it can be found, but it would be useful for folks learning to have it consolidated in one place. On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 07:30, Mark Filipak < [email protected]> wrote: > > I've written a glossary. Should I post it? ...Warning: It's bound to be controversial. Yes. The cliché is 'patches welcome', though obviously I don't speak for the project. If nothing else, I would be interested in reading/referring to a glossary. Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
