On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) <markfili...@bog.us> wrote:
> On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfili...@bog.us> > > wrote: > >> On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> Motion compensation does not work that way. > >> > >> Thank you, Paul. Yes, I knew that. I'm not seeking motion compensation. > >> Kindly reread my filter > >> features and suggest what comes closest. What I seek simply works on > >> pixels. I'm relying on your > >> experience (and perhaps the experiences of others here). > > > > Have you tried nnedi or estdif filters? Both are intra only > deinterlacers. > > Thank you for the guidance. I'm trying estdif first because it seems > simpler, but it doesn't do the > good thing. It does decomb very effectively, but it does it by aligning > (shifting) the edges in > field'2' to the edges in field'1' (which are not shifted). Aligning with > field'1' produces judder > (or in my case, doesn't eliminate judder). What I want it to do is align > both field'1' edges and > field'2' edges to the median (i.e. half way between the input's edges). I > do realize that such a > method would introduce combing along the edges of the frame, but that's > okay. > > Here's the command I used to transcode 24FPS to 60FPS: > ffmpeg -i 24[1][2].mkv -map 0 -filter_complex "telecine=pattern=5, > split[1][2], > [1]select=not(eq(mod(n\,5)\,2))[3], [2]select=eq(mod(n\,5)\,2), > estdif=mode=frame[4], > [3][4]interleave" -codec:v libx265 -x265-params "crf=16:qcomp=0.60" > -codec:a copy -codec:s copy > 24[1][2]-to-60[1][1][estdif=mode=frame(1~2)][2][2].mkv > > I'll try nnedi. Perhaps I can figure it out. > Do not even try. Mentioned filters work only with interlaced frames, while your use case is completely invalid and frowned upon. I deeply regret replying to this thread. > > Thanks again, > Mark. > > >> Regards, > >> Mark. > >> > >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:45 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > >> markfili...@bog.us> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello All, > >>>> > >>>> I seek a decomb filter that operates on H/2 number of line pairs: > lines > >> i > >>>> & i+1 (where i=0..H/2-1), > >>>> by aligning edges in the two lines at x = delta-x(edge)/2 (i.e. the > >>>> median). The ideal filter would > >>>> differentiate overall motion due to panning versus local motion due to > >>>> local object motion. > >>>> > >>>> Pan-combing on the left & right edges is acceptable but it would be a > >>>> great bonus if the filter > >>>> performed blend on those edges with the blending radius equal to > >> one-half > >>>> the pan-comb. > >>>> > >>>> Vertical, line-pair-to-line-pair processing is not needed or desired. > >>>> > >>>> Frame-to-frame processing is not needed or desired. > >>>> > >>>> I have been trying a great number of filters based on their names and > >> what > >>>> is in the documentation. > >>>> The best I've found so far is pp=linblenddeint but it obviously > doesn't > >>>> align edges via the edge > >>>> median and it obviously isn't aware of pan-combing versus > >>>> object-motion-combing. > >>>> > >>>> Any suggestions are very welcome. If I find this filter I will post a > >> link > >>>> to a 60FPS telecined > >>>> video that will amaze everyone -- better than anything that Cuda can > do. > >>>> > >>>> -Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".