On 02/06/2021 09:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 7. Feb. 2021 um 03:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
<markfili...@bog.us>:
"not deinterlaced" == not this:
pixel[0,0] pixel[0,1] ... pixel[0,in_w-1] pixel[2,0] pixel[2,1] ...
pixel[in_h-2,in_w-1] ...
pixel[1,0] pixel[1,1] ... pixel[1,in_w-1] pixel[3,0] pixel[3,1] ...
pixel[in_h-1,in_w-1]
In the terminology of the FFmpeg project (which is the only one
relevant on this mailing list), above is not called "deinterlaced".
That's fine. I understand. If it's not called "deinterlaced", then what do I
call it?
and, I should add, not in macroblocks in slices.
I still believe that macroblocks cannot have a meaning for raw video,
same with slices.
I agree. I'm simply being comprehensive.
--
I don't have a dog.
And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite.
And furthermore, you provoked him.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
