On 2/27/2021 1:57 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
You will be sued if you continue to share binaries built with -non-free
configure option.
Are you a lawyer in his jurisdiction? If not, then the threats are
meaningless. And do you even know if he _has_ distributed ffmpeg w/
"non-free"?? If not, then there is no issue.
How about, instead, simply pointing out what "non-free" means in the context
of ffmpeg and why it's a bad idea.
Martin-
Unless you -really- need --enable-gpl and --enable-nonfree, I'd drop them
both. (see https://ffmpeg.org/legal.html)
z!
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
