It's very difficult to figure out with any accuracy because codecs aren't
really testable outside the application that's using them, but my impression is
that the ffmpeg prores encoder - while very helpful and a massive timesaver -
is fairly CPU-hungry compared to the commercial options.
P
On Wednesday, 28 April 2021, 20:28:12 BST, Carl Zwanzig <c...@tuunq.com>
wrote:
On 4/28/2021 3:03 AM, Bouke wrote:
> Trying to capture decklink input to ProRes.
> FFmpeg is VERY cpu hungry (230 % on my sytem in the example below, increasing
> when upping the quality of Prores)
> Media Express / VTEncoderXPCservice use just half the CPU.
My assumption is that the BMD code is simply more optimized for the tasks
it's doing, and probably using a licensed encoder. Otherwise, are all the
parameters the same between tests? I was looking specifically at pix_fmt
(might need to move that earlier in the cmd line). (I'd experiment myself
with this but have a production on Saturday and a lot to do before that.)
> (Eventually I want to do multiple streams on a single machine.)
Do you need prores output? Can you capture into something else and then
transcode?
Later,
z!
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
