> A quick calculation gave me the impression that the number of decoded frames mostly matches the expectation ((8x60+9.5)x30000/1001) - what did you calculate?
Thanks for the reply Carl, and I apologize. I had pasted two commands that used slightly different files. We had an 'original' file from the old hardware. That video was supposedly 26:10.77, as reported by ffmpeg and VLC. When we tried to extract jpegs from that video, we ended up with 14,671 frames or ~ 8 minutes of video at 29.97 fps. If we scaled the original video, we also ended up with ~ 8 minutes of video. So I was trying to figure out how we were only getting 14,671 frames at 29.97 fps from 26 minutes of video. I see now that the original is definitely corrupted. If I let it play through in VLC, there are times where the timestamp jumps a full 3 minutes ahead. So I think this isn't an issue with ffmpeg or ffprobe, and simply a corrupted video whose file implies there is 26 minutes of video, when there is only 8 minutes. Thanks, Jon _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
