On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:07 AM Steven Kan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm. I hadn’t considered that. What I’m actually doing is combining two > 1920 x 1080 streams into a 3840 x 1080 stream. Would an NVidia 1030 be > able to do that, twice? > > ppl are right, 1030 cant encode (i couldn't imagine that !), only decoding, and afaik 1050 & 1650 low profile are dual slots, so, i may not fit into hpe (sure, one can alose tinker with riser cards & cables to make these cards external :-)) today these cards usually have enough cpu for doing your 4 1080p@25/30 fps (with reduced complexity presets), you'd need enough ram to hold 8M nv12 pixels... but these are not cheap even 2nd hand, chances are big a combo of 1650 & hpe would be more expensive than some different box. +, you've solved your load pb anyway with your mac :-) &rei
> Back on my Mac mini, I’m still learning how to manage services in macOS > vs. Raspbian, but I have the stream running right now: > > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIZVSZfzrxS6ynL8DQeC-Q/live > > My largest display is only 1920 x 1200. Can anyone with a 4K display tell > me if YT is presenting this as a 3840-wide stream? > > Thanks! > > p.s. re: my previous misgivings about a reduction to “only 30% CPU’ was > totally misguided. That’s 30% of one core, and the Mini has 8 cores, so the > system is very lightly loaded. GUI-level Activity Monitor shows Idle at > ~92%. I should be able to run many instances of ffmpeg on here, if I can > get them all running properly. > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
