I managed to get it working with overlay, using tee & named fifo.
In first attempt I had two ffmpeg instance:
1 - creating new image, merging with accumulator image and sending to
tee, which makes split job, redirecting it to second ffmpeg.
2 - takes output from ffmpeg-1 and shifts, preparing for new merge, and
feeds it to fifo, where ffmpeg-1 reads it again. But before ffmpeg-2
starts, ffmpeg-1 is seeded by null "starter" frame, generated by awk, so
that loop can start (I tried - it will not without initial seed).
That was able to reach 1150 fps.
I expected, that doing all job in one ffmpeg would give better speed.
Actual ffmpeg command:
stdbuf -o0 ffmpeg -nostdin -v verbose \
-vcodec rawvideo -f rawvideo -pix_fmt gray -s 1x1 -i pipe:0 \
-vcodec rawvideo -f rawvideo -pix_fmt gray -s ${w}x${h} \
-i "${loop_src}" -filter_complex "
[0:v]
scale = iw : 128 : flags = neighbor,
geq = lum='
if( gt(Y, H - p(X,Y) * H / 255 ),
80
)',
scale = iw : $h : flags = bicubic,
format = gray
[new];
[1:v]
convolution = 0 0 1 : 0mode = row,
format = gray
[acc_out];
[acc_out] [new]
overlay = W-1 : 0,
format = gray
" -vcodec rawvideo -f rawvideo - | stdbuf -o0 tee "${loop_src}"
and seed command:
stdbuf -o0 awk 'BEGIN {
for (i = 0; i < ('$w'*'$h'); i++)
printf "\0"
exit
}' > "${loop_src}" &
(as for loop_sink - it was used for second loop).
But instead - strange bootleneck appeared, keeping fps between 200 and
100. However, it's not cpu load - I can barely notice it. Suspecting IO
problem. At least during start - visible graphic movement speed
erratically increased, but otherwise was constrained.
I tried to change stdbuf -o to have buffer with size just to
hold output frame, but it did not make a difference.
Is it possible to reduce it without second ffmpeg instance?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
