On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 6:07 PM Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user < ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 29 November 2020, 15:55:29 GMT, Michael Koch < > astroelectro...@t-online.de> wrote: > > The name "feedback" is misleading because this signal isn't going back.> > It would make sense to rename "feedback" to "wet".> What's now "wet" could > be renamed "gain", or it could be removed because > it's unnecessary. > I may not be fully comprehending the behaviour of the software in this > case, but if your diagram is accurate that would make sense. Certainly it > would reflect the meaning of the terms "dry" and "wet" as they're commonly > used in audio processing. Using those terms in another way is confusing. > It is completely misleading and never was relevant, more so when there is new 'boost' option now. P > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
