On 9/29/23, Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:36 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 9/29/23, Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:01 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > -snip- >> >> Buffer underflow - something is too small in size. So there is unused, >> >> wasteful space left. >> > >> > That's not correct. >> > >> >> Also could mean decoder and/or demuxer did not processed whole buffer. >> > >> > That's not underflow. That can be produced by underflow, but it's not >> > underflow. >> > Why would a process access a buffer before buffering is finished? >> >> Clearly you know better ... > > Clearly. I've written 8051 real time code and kernel.
This have nothing to do with real time code and/or kernel. > >>... and do not need help at all. > > I do need help. I didn't write ffmpeg. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
