On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 8:01 PM Carl Zwanzig <c...@tuunq.com> wrote:
> On 11/7/2023 10:10 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > I never assume anything without sufficient facts and data I can confirm > > again and again using proven solutions and procedures. > > And yet, you seem to know enough to tell people that they're wrong, and do > so without telling them exactly what's wrong and how to correct it. Sounds > like that's being "More extremely lazy". > I answered all relevant sane questions. If something is still unclear ask again. > > "but as usual you misinterpret it almost always via your logic fallacies." > Missing was an explanation of what those supposed logic fallacies are and > how they're false. > > "I can answer it, but I guess OP will listen to your usual misinformation." > How do you know they will? Is it actually "misinformation" (still not > answered)? Why didn't you answer it correctly in the first place? > > > Oh, and don't bother again saying that I (or Mark, or Phil, etc) should be > banned. > You are just adding not very useful noise. > > z! > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".