Licensing is not the issue. Show of force required. On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:41 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> > > Am 28.11.23 um 11:35 schrieb David Bernat: > > Please unsubscribe. I have sent numerous requests. > > what is your problem? > > nobody needs another 10 mails within minutes in the style of "This is > not meant to be used as a library. This is an application" > > it's not possible to change the license, it won't happen and both where > statet clearly - so no reason to ride the dead horse in another 10 mails > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:34 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 28.11.23 um 11:32 schrieb Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena: > >>> This is the reason OpenJDK is successful though at this point of time > >> they > >>> are very well at a point they can change the license. > >>> > >>> GPL nature of the license prevented fragmentation by de-incentivising > >>> competing incompatible hard forks. > >> > >> leave us in peace - a license change won't happen even if it would be > >> possible but it isn't > >> > >> case closed > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
