Sometimes it’s wanted / needed to have all files ’the same’. > If that is interlaced, it’s interlaced. Codec should say ‘interlaced’, no > matter the actual content. > > For Avid media, that might (depending on the version of MC) be important > for a ‘fast import’, or omitting adapters you don’t want / need. > > In broadcast, over here interlaced is mandatory, even if the content is > progressive. > > So no, it’s NOT complicated, and no, it’s NOT outdated. > > Bouke >
I was only referring to applicability of my statement, not to the practice as such — only taking the (likely) possibility into consideration that one would have a different (i.e., better) approach to the required workflows than I did about 10 years ago. If the solution is still applicable, I have no reason nor intention to object or make a judgment. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
