On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 12:07, Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For example, if 'v' (video) and 'a' (audio) packets go from > v-a-a-a-a-v-a-a-a-a-v... to > a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-v-v-v..., then somethings wrong, eh? That's the kind of > difference I'm seeing > between the two versions of 01.mp4. Forgive me for jumping in in the middle here, but is that strictly true? Honest question, perhaps the spec says that they should be identical. In much the same way a*b*c is equivalent to b*a*c, does the order of packets necessarily matter if the output is perceptually the same? If the output is not perceptually the same, or there are timing issues / desync / other problems as a result then I can see that being a potentially important bug. Cheers, Rob PS I've been following along as I am also interested in cutting and re-joining- my first query to this ML was about whether there's a way to chop off the starts and ends of some clips, add transitions and re-encode those short overlapping bits, and then join them back on to their parent clips to avoid having to re-encode the whole lot _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".