Well, I am not ignorant, just stating the facts, especially about the online-converter.
What you are writing contradicts with the facts here: It's not a matter of liking or not, it's a fact. ************************* Now, I tell you what: 1. make a wav-files (16 Bit, 44.1 kHz) "sound.wav" 2. use the mentioned online converter from "sound.wav" to "upload.mov" 3. Upload this "upload.mov" to youtube. 4. Go to the youtube-link and download the file "download.mov" 5. extract the sound file out of "download.mov" --> "extracted.wav" 6. Compare the original file "sound.wav" with "extracted.wav" with its spectrogramms. (Audacity or Spectral Layers for instance) --> et voila the files are exactly the same! Now what? On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:29 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 24.05.24 um 00:25 schrieb Zathras Yes: > > Well, why being so rude? > > because you are ignorant > > > Than would you be so kind to explain, why the online converter does the > > trick? > > it don't > > > > I would expect, that ffmpeg could do the same, right? > > > > a MOV-CONTAINER can't contain WAV/PCM > youtube says: AAC audio in MOV container > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
