On 20/11/2025 10.47, Ulf Zibis via ffmpeg-user wrote: > > Am 20.11.25 um 16:08 schrieb Mark Filipak via ffmpeg-user: >> On 20/11/2025 06.39, Carlos E. R. via ffmpeg-user wrote: >>> On 2025-11-20 12:29, Carlos E. R. via ffmpeg-user wrote: >>>> On 2025-11-20 00:11, Mark Filipak via ffmpeg-user wrote: >>>>> In the message I just wrote to ffmpeg-user, it appears that ffmpeg-user >>>>> added a "Cc:" header. >>>>> >>>>> Not only is that undesired, the "Cc:" header is wrong. >>>> Testing. >>> Confirm. >>> >>> The usual is >>> >>> from name via mail list >>> to mail list >>> reply to <sender> >>> >>> Now >>> >>> from name via mail list >>> to mail list >>> cc to <sender> >>> >>> However, I have not received a double mail. I did not get the cc copy. >> You would not get a copy because what you sent did not include the "Cc:" >> header. ffmpeg-user added it to what it displays as though you _had_ >> included it. The "Cc:" headers ffmpeg-user is adding are phony. >> >> That creates a spam risk for senders -- us -- because a spammer could >> subscribe to ffmpeg-user and harvest those phony "Cc:" headers. > > On the other hand, without it would no more be possible to privately answer > to a sender. > Spammers already know all our emails from harvesting before June 2025 or from > elsewhere. > > So I more liked it as it was since June 2025: > From: <sender> > To: <ffmpeg-user> > List-ID: ffmpeg-user > > Then I could better sort or search by sender. and with the 2 buttons "Answer" > and "Answer to List" in Thunderbird Messenger I could simply decide, where to > send. > Both is no more possible since July 2025. > > -Ulf
Oh, I wholeheartedly agree, Ulf. The new setup is convenient, but there are better ways, ways that can't be harvested. Those better ways would require some thinking and some work. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
