g >>>> To unsubscribe send an [email protected] >>> As written by Bouke : "Bullshit. H.265 IS LOSSY ...the best quality is >>> ‘visually lossless’... but look/trust your eyes. " ????? >> So, is there a question in here I’m missing? >> Was something I said unclear? Did you toy around already with the >> suggestions I gave you? And have posted the output of FFmpeg as others have >> requested? >> That all is less work than you seem to put in writing mails. >> We can’t help you if you don’t try to help yourself. >> >> Bouke >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email [email protected] > > > Refer to https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.265#Losslessencoding > > > Lossless encoding > > Use the |-x265-params lossless=1| option. Adding |-crf 0| is not required. > > You can verify lossless encoding by looking for |x265 [info]: lossless > compression ratio| in the console output from your encoding command, or refer > to the hash demuxer <https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-formats.html#hash> for > verification. >
First, if you quote me, do NOT quote me out of context. I stated that H 264 in best quality was visually lossless. I did not make any claim about H 265 as I don’t know. But, the fact that H 265 CAN be lossless has absolutely no meaning at all for your situation, as you don’t use it. So this is a totally pointless conversation. And again, you cannot compare the quality of an encoder with the original if you add effects in the mix. Of course the output will differ from the original. Bouke _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
