On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 09:00:47AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Jeff Licquia wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 01:30:47PM -0400: > > > We know that there are a number of other objectionable sections in the > > FHS from the BSD point of view. If and when we get a decent solution > > to those problems, we can rethink the way /run happens as part of that > > solution. > > Sure; however, what you just committed would not help to improve > that situation, but rather add another item to the list of issues > to be rethought.
Just as a datapoint, on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD we use a nullfs mount during initial setup so that /run has the same contents as /var/run. On the next system restart, we transition /var/run to be a symlink, and /run to a tmpfs mount. This is identical to what we do on Linux, except there we use a bind mount rather than nullfs. If nullfs is supported by all BSDs, this could be a possible solution. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
