On Tue, 12.07.11 16:12, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:46:02PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 11.07.11 18:59, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > many users/sysadmins are alarmed by the messages of the systemd init > > > as systemd does complain that /usr as a separate partition isn't > > > supported anymore[1,2,3,4]. > > > > split-off /usr is fine. > > > > What isn't supported really anymore is /usr that isn't available all the > > time during boot. > > > > In other words: as long as you mount /usr in the initramfs everything is > > fine. In fact you could even split off /etc if you want to -- as long as > > you mount it in initramfs -- and not wait for it until you jumped into > > the main system. > > > > To my knowledge FHS doesn't really deal with how the system looks like > > during the earlier stages of the boot process, and hence this discussion > > is irrelevant for LSB or FHS. > > I do not have any problems with this approach but I'm aware of > many users/customers which do have problems with such an approach. > Some of them even do not like initramfs ;)
Well, they are already alone with that if they really do. The suse kernel doesn't boot without initramfs, and it's not supported on rhel either. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
