On Thursday 2012-03-01 00:44, Harald Heigl wrote:
>
>Or should I mount discs1, disc2 directly to /srv and then do my remounts
>from there? I've also thought about /mnt, but FHS says I shouldn't put
>subfolders there, correct?
You can put Directories into /mnt, but you need to be aware that whatever
you put there may not survive a reboot.
>The specification about /srv seems quite unclear to me. It more or less
>states "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified
>as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done.", this was
>the information back in 2003 with version 2.3 and now 9 years later no real
>change in draft 3.0, is there really no "consensus"?
Given all the bikeshedding going on, one wonders if there is any consensus
left.
But basically, /srv is just like /home ("do whatever you like").
/var/www just was not considered the right place, since /var is
for machine-specific local data, which webpages and such generally are not.
>So what would be best practice in your opinion, how do you handle that?
Turns out that on a naslike device, I mounted all extra disks into
/mnt/<shortname> directories (because that's short), and later only bind
mounted them into /srv/ftp/<descriptive name, but still a directory not a
/folder :-p>.
_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
