Hi,
thanks for the answer, I think I'll change my concept a little bit.
/usr/local will be really local for the specific computer
/usr/local/shared (not /usr/local/share), will be used for scripts amongst
all computers, perhaps a nfs-share mounted on the all computers (or
something syncing).

I've thought about /usr/local/share, but this shouldn't be used between
different OSes and Versions. (having Ubuntu, debian, fedora and a busybox).

I don't like to mess up my root-dir :-)

Any other suggestions, ideas?
Thanks,
Harald

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jan Engelhardt [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 01:40
> An: Harald Heigl
> Cc: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [fhs-discuss] local scripts (/usr/local?)
> 
> On Sunday 2012-03-11 23:49, Harald Heigl wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >I've thought of mailing to the thread of last week regarding /usr/local,
but
> >since my question is a little bit different I open a new thread.
> >
> >I use /usr/local mainly for my own scripts, config files, whatsoever ...
> >I sync /usr/local between all my linux-machines, that works well so far.
But
> >there are also some own scripts/config-files which should stay local and
not
> >be synced.
> >For now I use something like /usr/local/local/computer1/,
> >/usr/local/local/computer2/ ... which are excluded in my sync-script.
> >
> >Just wanted to know: Do you have similar scenarios, what's your solution?
> 
> * drbd-ocfs2
> * glusterfs geo replication
> 
> on a named directory of personal preference (i.e. totally non-standard
> and irrelevant to FHS :-), designated for distribution across machines.
> /myhappymountpoint or /sync. Whatever came along when setting up a
> node.

_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss

Reply via email to