On Wednesday 2014-02-05 19:07, Jeff Licquia wrote: > >Actually, either list is fine, although it's true that the LSB has taken >over maintenance of FHS, and so more of the people working on it will be >over there. > >To answer your question, FHS 3.0 got delayed due to the LF security >incident a few years ago, and is now slated to be part of LSB 5.0, which >is currently in beta.
So where can one read the FHS3 draft? _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
