On Wed, Jun 19, Mats Wichmann wrote: > With FHS not very active it's hard to describe a full process. For > editorial changes judgement can just be applied; for a substantive > change that requires some consensus we can try to collect that but it's > hard to say when "enough" has been achieved. > > The process should, however, always include a bug filed at > bugs.linuxfoundation.org in the FHS category.
I created https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1439 But if I look at the open bugs, I don't think that there will ever something happen. With all the changes going on in the Linux distribution world, we should really somehow revive it again, else we will be back in the pre-FHS time, and the FHS is then the reason for it. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
