somplace down the line, and, i think, 'here,'  someone priced handspun at 
singles, the, if plied, 3 x that price ( 2 singles then run thru again to 
ply.)      i'm sure y'all will correct me and i'd really appreciate that !     
maybe a year ago?   or MORE????    

--- On Sat, 4/10/10, Gail W (Ozark Carding Mill) <whit...@earthlink.net> wrote:


From: Gail W (Ozark Carding Mill) <whit...@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [fibernet] Re:pricing handspun
To: fibernet@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, April 10, 2010, 12:32 PM


  



Just a thought. I've tried to keep track of time, when spinning. Something
always interfers and I don't stop the timer or I forget to look at the clock.

By charging by the yard, everyone pays the same amount. It doesn't matter what 
the
weight of yarn or the time I spend spinning it, I'm getting paid for my time.
If the customer doesn't have the fiber, then I charge for the fiber. It's 
simple and
easy to keep track of. 

There have been some doggie blends that we couldn't machine spin, and I 
included the 
processing charges as well. Gail

-----Original Message-----
>From: JC Sandstrom <jsand...@yahoo. com>
>Sent: Apr 9, 2010 4:41 PM
>To: fiber...@yahoogroup s.com
>Subject: Re: [fibernet] Re:pricing handspun
>
>
>Hey Everyone--
> 
>Just have to chine in here that I just bought some handspun, 2 ply alpaca at 6 
>to 8 wpi for $8/oz.  I think I got a good deal.
> 
>John S.
> 
>--- On Fri, 4/9/10, Gail W (Ozark Carding Mill) <whit...@earthlink. net> wrote:
>
>
>From: Gail W (Ozark Carding Mill) <whit...@earthlink. net>
>Subject: Re: [fibernet] Re:pricing handspun
>To: fiber...@yahoogroup s.com
>Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 10:43 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>I have a friend that spins for others. She charges 10 cents a yard for 2 ply 
>and 15 cents per yard for 3 ply.
>She does basic spinning, nice and even in different weights, fingering, sport, 
>etc. She also weaves for others and charges
>5.00 foot.
>
>Gail White
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>









      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to