Whilst working for a multimedia company a last year I remember ordering 500
CD's with our own 2 colour design printed on the disc. The cost was very
close to what we had been paying for blank discs.
--
Regards
Richard
//////////////
| @ @ ------->>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C _) )
--- '
__ /
> From: "Bruce Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 18:07:27 +1000
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: labelling archive cdrs
>
> I couldn't agree more. Printable labels are great for distribution of your
> own commercial products but why bother with them for your own use?
>
> Also, I don't think I've ever seen a brand of CD-R or CD-RW which
> specifically recommends against using any specific type of felt-tipped
> marker. Of course, they do say not to use anything other than a felt-tipped
> marker...
>
> In answer to another posting (Rob?), I've been sent many CDs with stick-on
> labels and never experienced problems reading them. This includes (over a
> few years), a 4x speed, 12x speed, 32x speed, 40x Speed and 52x speed
> CD-ROMs. Also, I've not had any problems with an 8x DVD and a 8x4x32x CD-RW.
> Most of the sticker kits come with a cheap but effective plastic application
> guide which obviously do a good enough job. I once had a CD-ROM that had
> trouble reading *any* CDs, but I think that was in the days when they where
> getting faster (24x Maybe?) but didn't have any dampening mechanisms which
> seem common today. It would make one hell of a racket with about a quarter
> of the CDs I put in it. Sounded like a real imbalance problem (it was sent
> back under warrantee). That's my experience anyway...
>
> Bruce Roberts.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2000 8:18 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: labelling archive cdrs
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 9/20/00 4:16:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>> I used Neato labels, applied with the supplied polycarbonate
>>> centring device, on over a hundred CDRs sent in 1997-99 to
>>> a wide range of users. All them will have been used at least
>>> once <G>. No-one has complained about unplayable disks, and
>>> this doesn't surprise me.
>>>
>>> It was difficult or impossible to place the label
>>> off-centre, because the applicator was quite precisely
>>> machined and beautifully simple.
>>>
>>
>> I am sure the gadgets place the labels well and the labels are fine but I
>> object to the expense. Not only is the label kit expensive for what it
>> contains, but the replacement labels are expensive. Perhaps I haven't
>> found the right place to buy them. <g>
>> Barb
>>
>> ====================================================================
>> The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
>> To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE
>> FILMSCANNERS in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if
>> you are reading the Digest.
>
>
> ====================================================================
> The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
> To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in
> the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
>
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
