> > ...
> >
> > Aliasing isn't relevant to this question.
>
> But, er, what you just described *is* aliasing.
>
Uh no, it is not aliasing. Not even in the slightest. The
physical cell simply acts as low pass filter due to its size
and geometry. Mathematically it is the 2 dimensional convolution
of the cell's structure with an idealised point sampler. NONE
of this causes ANY aliasing to occur but the damage (in
terms of softness) has already been done.
My attempt to tease this out:
Both phenomena depend on the use of a grid. But while aliasing
is exemplified by forcing a pixel to be all one color (a binary
sort if thing), the low pass effect has to do with diffraction
effects, physics on order of the wavelength of light. It seems
to me that the two effects might even cancel a little if the
diffusion provided some antialiasing.
Is this close to right?
Bill Ross
- RE: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Bond, Alistair
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they see. Rob Geraghty
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Austin Franklin
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Bill Ross
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Austin Franklin
- RE: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Austin Franklin
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what they... Craig W. Shier
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and w... Tony Sleep
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners a... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Re[3]: filmscanners: Film Scanners and what ... Tony Sleep
