> > > 3.9 just means 13 bits of dynamic range. > > > Out of curiosity, how do you come up with this (especially the word > > 'means')? > log10(2^13) = 3.913 > It's just math. That doesn't take into account the performance of the CCD, or the analog front end, or the actual converter performance. Do you have any idea if the manufacturers actually do any testing to conclude that what they claim as a spec, is how the system actually performs? If they are basing their specs on purely empirical data, then they are not, in my book, really accurate specs.
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... photoscientia
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... bjs
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: ... photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web si... Austin Franklin
- Dynamic range solved was Re: filmscanners: Sprints... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Henry Richardson
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
