I'm not sure which thread or topic this really is, but since I really need help, I'll ask from my confused heart: Julian wrote: > > >Now, let's unplug the 8 bit D/A, and plug in a 12 bit D/A instead, to the > > >same circuit. My point is - NOTHING CHANGES. Then Ray Amos wrote: > Is there anyone out there other than the participants who has any idea > what they are saying? For us who think we understand some of it, but lately have started to doubt our earlier pictures of bits and stuff, is there any good place on the web where someone gives a thorough explanation of how D/A converters work - preferably with graphics? Like: what does "linearity" really mean in this particular context? Do more bits really mean finer discrimination between levels? What I think I need is a place that starts from basics but keeps on going to qualified definitions. Not yet hopeless, but lost Ingemar Lindahl
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the b... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's ... photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Ray Amos
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Why didn't I think of this be... Ingemar Lindahl
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Viacheslav Zilberfayn
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
