RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits?

[Austin Franklin]

>> Typically, the image data only falls in part of the range of the CCD,
>> and should be more in the middle, not the ends.

> Well, that's part of my point.

You're suggesting treating the CCD non-linearly it appears.  There is a
thought to that, but I will say, that you're probably not going to get any
better (read as more usable) information from it...would be my first
thought.

I believe that doing either multiple exposures and/or multiple input ranges
pretty much does the same thing, doesn't it?