At 12:26 AM 1/17/01 -0600, you wrote: >While you may very well be right about the only difference being in the >addition of new film emulsion hardeners to prevent scratching, Kodak claims >to have done more than this to the film so as to make it more appropriate >for scanning. I believe I've also heard that Supra-100 is mostly a minor rework of one of their older films -- Ektar, maybe? The faster Supra films are supposedly new formulations. In any case, I stick with ISO 100 mostly for my landscape photography, and wasn't that interested in "faster" -- just better. rafe b.
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Henry Richardson
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask chuck phelps
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask JFMahony91
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Hart or Mary Jo Corbett
