> > Some CCDs feature anti-blooming so that this does not happen. > > I think all current generation CCD's try to do this, but there's still a > point at > which charge leaks between pixels. > > This may be true for linear CCDs, but it is definitely not standard for scientific CCDs. When I last looked about 3 years ago, NO scientific CCDs were available with anti-blooming. > ---- > Dean Shough > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 Shough, Dean
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Julian Robinson
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Tony Sleep
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Shough, Dean
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprints... Raphael Bustin
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Spr... Julian Robinson
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Shough, Dean
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Shough, Dean
