Re: filmscanners: real value?

[John Matturri]

> You are right on both accounts.  As written it makes no sense at all; but a
> relatively non acrobatic leap to the assumption you suggest would be in
> order.
>
> > At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
> >
> >> (3)  Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other
> features
> >> come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
> >> inkjets.
>

Actually, I like the fact that inkjets are somewhat worse and better
than inkjets but not that inkjets might be equal to inkjets.

John M.