On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:42:56 -0600 Jack Phipps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > By the way, I've just now run a test and I've saved a small part of an image > that takes up about 700 kb. I was going to attach the results but I didn't > know if that is allowed on this list. Should I do that or is there an > archive where I can post the results. I would be glad to send them to you > Julie in a separate email. You can attach files up to 80k or so. But uploading them to a website, if you have one, is preferable really, as virus checkers on list and digest members accounts frequently get hysterics about attached image files and/or ISP's or postmasters block them. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Cooke, Julie
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems WRGill
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems WRGill
- filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Colin Maddock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems IronWorks
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Jack Phipps
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Stan Schwartz
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Henry Richardson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Shough, Dean
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Henry Richardson
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Brian D. Buck
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems(pho... Viacheslav Zilberfayn
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Jack Phipps
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Stan Schwartz
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems EdHamrick
