Yes, if you've got the space. I'd rather have a 21" and a 17" though. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 6:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac under $500? > > > On 9 Feb 2001 19:08:34 -0800 Frank Paris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > My recommendation is, whatever you do, don't get a 17" for > digital darkroom > > stuff. > > No, but it may be sensible to get two! > > Regards > > Tony Sleep > http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film > scanner info & > comparisons
- filmscanners: VueScan 6.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7 Available Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7 Available Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7 Available Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7 Available Chris McBrien
- filmscanners: Monitor for Mac under $500? Berry Ives
- RE: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac under $... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac un... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Ma... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac under $... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac under $... Raymond Carles
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac un... Berry Ives
- Re(2): filmscanners: Monitor for... Raymond Carles
- RE: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac un... Sumtingwong
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Mac un... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor for Ma... Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Monitor fo... Richard
- filmscanners: CANON INTRODUC... Collin Ong
- filmscanners: Canon vs. Niko... Ray Amos