I run 3 PC at home and 3 at work, all using W2k. I will never go back. The
machines are from Pentium 166MMX (overclocked to 200), through Celeron 300
(466) to PIII 800, work various PII and PIII around 400 mark. Memory - the
most important think, get as much as you can squeeze. Mine are at least 128
MB, up to 512. Bus speed is irrelevant. In Sydney memory PC133/PC100 is
below AUD100 for 128 MB stick, and AUD170 for 256 stick. At least it was
last Sunday. The only reason for a dual boot is lack of drivers for w2k.
At 16:10 7/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>IronWorks wrote:
>
>>Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K? Microsoft's site recommends the PC133
>>minimum.
>>Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and also
>>2K.
>>Maris
>
>Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a Celeron
>system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
>
>Art
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow
in Australia".
