Which would be a reason for dual-boot systems, of course.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?
| My understanding is that Win2K is a replacement upgrade for Win NT. It
| would be most useful to those who utilize large networks. It supposedly
is
| more stable than Win 98, 98SE, and ME; but it does not cupport the range
of
| drivers that are supported under the other versions - at least not yet.
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:17 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
| W98SE?
|
|
| In a message dated 03/07/2001 6:42:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| << Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K
all
| use the same colour management system.
|
| Rob >>
|
|
| I was just getting ready to run out and spend $350 (?) on Win2K when I
| already have WinMe. What are the advantages to the 2K "pro" version
besides
| the letters on the box? And who is it useful to?
| Ed
|
