On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:43:09 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I do not think the Premium Glossy Photo Paper (EPGPP) would be of any > benefit to you. Yeah, that is the way it looked to me too :) In fact a hammer is what I need - I've been struggling to print an image all evening which is acquiring about +30M c/o some gremlin. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Colormatch RGB Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Colormatch RGB Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Colormatch RGB Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners:OT:Epson papers Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Dave King
