Dave wrote: >Nikonscan's CM works as well as possible, with a near perfect match to >the result in Photoshop. Also Nikonscan does the best color >corrections out of the box of anything I've seen, on chromes and negs. >And, as I noted previously, the sharpening algorithm it uses is very >good. Er, but as I noted previously, Nikonscan is *useless* for me as it produces jaggies. Vuescan is my only option. Yes, I really like the colour adjustment facilities in Nikonscan, but they're no good to me if the output is garbage due to a bug. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Rob Geraghty
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Dave King
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Dave King
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Review of... Rob Geraghty
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Revie... Dave King
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: R... Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Blue noise - sugg... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Blue nois... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Blue nois... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Blue nois... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Blue ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Blue nois... Tony Sleep
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanne... Dave King
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmsc... Tony Sleep