Even better might be a wacom (or other) tablet, which gives the additional benefit of pressure sensitivity. Holding a pen seems much more natural than a mouse for fine movements and raising the pen up and down is much better than clicking the mouse for cloning. Beyond all this I'm not subject to the backaches that used to come from extended photoshop use. With limited space even a 4x5 tablet works well. A better more expensive than a mouse but I think worth it. John M. "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." wrote: > Be sure that you are using an *optical* mouse or trackball - it will track > much more smoothly.. > > | Maybe, with practice I will be able to select sections better. Has anyone > | tried adjusting their mouse movement settings (slow it down,reduce > | accelleration) to make this easier ? > | > | Steve > |
- Re: filmscanners: What caus... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any e... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there ... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there ... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is th... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and i... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is th... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any e... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there ... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is th... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and i... John Matturri
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and i... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any e... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there ... Steve Greenbank