Vai jus esat latvietis? Karlis Schulmeisters ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:28 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding > And, of course, the color gamut of film is greater than that of print. > > Maris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Shomler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:42 PM > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding > > > | >There is no doubt in my mind that scanning the negative is far better > | >than scanning the print. > | > | My list of some reasons to scan from negative rather than print, > | accumulated over three years of neg scan experience (and with a > | lot of jump-start knowledge from others on the filmscanners list): > > [snipped] >
- filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding James L. Sims
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbeddi... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbeddi... Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatb... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatb... Alan Tyson
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning ... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning ... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscann... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning ... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscann... Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Films... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Films... Tony Sleep