> > I suppose its possible Polaroid owners are unwilling to admit they spend > their nights at home doing dust spotting, since they laid out all that > ca$h on the SS4000, but I'd expect someone would break ranks and blow > the whistle. > I just have the Artixscan 4000T. Unless you keep your scanner and images in a slicon chip factory or some other unusually clean environment. It's a bloody nightmare. > I'd love to hear from others who have experience with either or (even > better) both scanners and who doesn't have an ongoing professional > relationship with either or both manufacturers. I'd love to give a Nikon a go - if ICE is 95% effective I would probably buy one. I'm not willing to drop another grand on something that isn't a lot better. Steve
- Re: filmscanners: =?iso-8859-... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Ni... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perf... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS2000 problem David Hoffman
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Lynn Allen