"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > of Fuji 800 taken in full daylight > Best to rate at 640 IME, it helps keep grain under control, and cleans up > the shadows appreciably. I'll bear that in mind if I shoot a roll in the SLR. Unfortunately with disposible cameras I have no control over anything! :) (none of the newer underwater cameras I'm aware of allow manual setting of the ISO; they all use DX coding. Probably an older Nikonos would, so maybe that's something to bear in mind but if and when I get a "real" underwater camera I'll be using it with a strobe and slower film. I don't think anyone makes a housing for my Pentax) Rob
- filmscanners: Films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Films for scanning David Corwin
- Re: filmscanners: Films for scanning rafeb
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films for ... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re=3A=20films... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning? Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Diffused scanners... Marvin Demuth
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning Tony Sleep
