> I have had LightJet prints made on a number of occasions, and > they are beautiful. The native resolution of the CS-5000 > printer is 305 dpi. You cannot see any digital artifacts > whatsoever on the print. > > The Pictro print that I own isn't a good showcase for resolution, > alas. It was given to me as a gift. Great! The Pictro 4000 is 400 dpi with lower resolutions selectable. Thanx, JM Shen
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical Dark... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical... John C. Jernigan
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chem... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional ... John C. Jernigan
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventio... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventio... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Digital vs Conv... laurie
- filmscanners: "Thanks&qu... John C. Jernigan
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical... youheng
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chem... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chem... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical... Lynn Allen
