On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Robert Meier
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> The best thing is still to use corresponding film or a correction
> filter to do a rough correction. Otherwise, some of the film layers
> will be underexposed. Which ones depends on the light source. The rest
> can be fixed in PS.
Quite right in theory, but in practice I have found no problem with any
film I have tried. I have even achieved surprisingly good corrected scans
from KR64. Superia400 has plenty of tolerance.
If I stick a (say) 30M on the front to shoot in, say, a strip-lit office,
it causes more problems than it solves (v/f too dim to focus, forced to use
a silly slow shutter speed and/or wide aperture with no DOF). I was very
glad to be able to escape all that.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons
