Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Arthur writes: > > > How do you know upgrading to an LS-4000 (even > > if it had SCSI interfacing) wouldn't bring your > > system down? > > Because I already have all the necessary software installed to address the > scanner. > Yes, but some of the modules of that software that communicate with the LS 4000 are likely not being used in your current configuration AND you have no idea what evil Nikon has hidden in their firmware within the scanner! As long as I don't engage the spell checker in Netscape it rarely crashes on my system, but 5% of the time I use that module, smack! I find my system is very sneaky. It is much more likely to freeze or crash when I turn my back on it (I think it knows better ;-)) Art
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Brad Smith
- filmscanners: Histograms? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low... Ian Boag
- Dual-boot help WAS: filmscanne... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: yet *another... Tony Sleep