No! Not any more so than anyone else in the industry. I read a quick post claiming that the review was good and *objective*. I read it and thought: this is the same sort of pay-the-bills purveyor-centered review that typifies the industry reviewing of *everything* from cars to hi-fis, to sporting goods, etc. It purports to take the consumer into account, but is mostly about the needs of the purveyors. This just really bugged me at that moment, so I decided to comment about it.
This was only my opinion, and off the cuff for that matter. Wire on 10/3/01 4:19 AM, Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 03:32 03-10-01 -0400, you wrote: > > So then you're both of the opinion that Bruce Fraser prostituted his > considerable reputation because the website has to pander to its advertisers? >
