Dave wrote: >is simply more grain in some areas of the negative than others. I >wonder if this is due to some sort of "stacking" effect (Austin?), >whereby areas with dyes closer to the color of the base appear >grainier.
Tony - are you around? Tony mentioned something about different grain being more or less visible in different areas of the film. I thin it was in response to a comment I made about how variable the grain is in T400CN. Grain in shadows is very coarse, while in highlights it's virtually non-existent. I think it had something to do with which emulsion layers were most sensitive to which intensities of light and therefore what got removed in processing? Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com