Comments inserted in redacted version of earlier messages below.

At 11:20 AM 11/27/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>>But they grumbled about how I should have a lead lined pouch.
>
>Sort of funny in a way.  I fail to see how a lead lined bag would help
>matters since it would prevent the film from being x-rayed and would
>necessitate a hand check anyway.  How would that be any different that
>putting the film in a baggie and asking for the hand check straight out?  

I routinely carry my film in lead lined bags and have found that only about one 
security check in 10 will result in a hand search.  In addition, 1-2 out of ten result 
in a question from the screener "film?" and a nod OK when you say yes.  The majority 
of the time a camera bag with 200 rolls of film in lead lined pouches, 6-8 camera 
bodies and 5-6 lenses just zips right through the X-ray scanner without so much as a 
raised eyebrow by the screener.   This may change after 09/11 but I will bet it 
changes to a hand check being required perhaps 3-4 times out of ten.  The big 
difference is that if you put the film in a baggie, ask for a hand check and it is 
refused, your film must go through the scanner with NO protection.  

Just another  comment about lead lined bags and X-ray scanner intensity.  It is true 
that SOME but by no means all these scanners do increase the X-ray dosage slightly (it 
still must be very low for health safety reasons) if the scanner sees opaque objects.  
However, camera bodies and lenses are dense enough to create this response, so putting 
your film in a lead lined bag does not actually result in higher X-ray intensity than 
would otherwise be used on a camera bag with both cameras and film inside.

>I
>really think that you and others have run into instances of bureaucratic
>ritualism and pragmatism which holds that you follow the rules to the letter
>at any cost even if it is impractical so as to make your life easier, your
>work more routine and standardized with less problems, and you have the
>security of knowing that your ass is covered.
Yes, but the bureaucratic response in this case is to insist on breaking the rules.  
Yes, I know the requirement to hand check film on request is about as binding a law as 
our road speed limits, but a screener who refuses a hand check is, in fact, violating 
not enforcing the rules.

 

Reply via email to