It is more expensive, but not that much more. I bought 512mb of RDRAM for $160.
Tom ----- > Is RDRAM a better choice for systems used for scanning and > processing large 2d image files? The PC mags report recently (maybe Nov-Dec) that RDRAM is only a few percent faster than DDR. It's no surprise that Dell got off the RDRAM wagon. RDRAM is much, much more expensive than DDR. A gig of DDR will work wonders for your constitution. > > > Does anyone have any suggestions for www sites that discuss > this issue? > > Thanks and happy new year, > JimD > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ------------ > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the > title or body > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or body
